![]() ![]() The original idea of 24-bit 192hz flac was for vinyl rips, where hypothetically you might be getting more information. You can’t transcode mp3s without killing the quality so if you ever want to convert formats (like for a mp3 player), you should stick with flac (16-bit, 48hz). That being said, I think flac is generally a good choice for a music collection. This is also why modern vinyl releases sound a lot better than digital: they are mastered differently since its assumed everyone is going to be listening on good equipment. This is why when downloading music you should avoid remasters (there are some exceptions, like the Beatles mono and stereo boxed sets that came out awhile ago) and go for the first edition presses. Since everyone is listening of crappy earbuds, they compress the hell out of it and destroy all dynamic range. The reason why a lot of recent digital music sounds bad is because of the intentionally terrible mastering. You can only the difference between mp3 and flac at shitty bitrates no one uses anymore (like 120). Problem with music sounding bad doesn’t really have much to do with the distributed format: V0, V1, or 320 mp3s should sound pretty much the same compared to 16-bit flac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |